Compare the two solutions designed for ambitious finance and treasury teams looking to save time, boost productivity, and reduce risks.
.png)
3 reasons to choose Payflows over Kyriba
1
Self and tailor-made setup
Self and tailor-made setup
Kyriba requires dedicated IT resources and takes over 4 months to implement. Payflows, with a self-serve and tailor-made setup, is up in 1-2 months with no extra work needed.
.png)
2
Real time global connectivity
Real time global connectivity
Kyriba uses traditional bank channels and lacks modern API integration. Payflows supports both, with real-time payments and continuous data flow for a complete financial overview.
.png)
3
Modern user-friendly platform
Modern user-friendly platform
Kyriba's complex design slows adoption and requires extensive user training. Payflows’ user-friendly designed platform ensures immediate value, even for advanced features.
.png)
Comparison table of Payflows vs Kyriba
Payflows provides finance teams with the core functionalities of traditional treasury software, enhanced by modern API connectivity, real-time reporting, and user-friendly tools.
Implementation time
1-2 months
4-5 months
Bank and ERP integrations
Cash visibility and payment capabilities
User-friendly interface
Built-in API banking connectivity
Real-time finance reporting
Self-serve implementation (no integrator needed)
Responsive and dedicated support team
Virtual Cards Add-On
Procurement Module
AI-powered assistant
Our clients trust us
.png)
We use Payflows to sync data from our banks, contract lifecycle management, ticketing systems, and ERP in a single place, giving our teams access to the information they need, in context. Payflows allowed us to break silos while saving a lot of money and reducing the number of licenses we have for each tool.
François-Guillaume Lutton
Chief Financial Officer at Reezocar (Group Société Générale)
Ready to boost your financial productivity?
Get started today, set-up in minutes