Compare the two solutions designed for ambitious finance and treasury teams looking to save time, boost productivity, and reduce risks.
.png)
3 reasons to choose Payflows over Diapason
1
Self and tailor-made setup
Self and tailor-made setup
Diapason requires dedicated IT resources and takes over 4 months to implement. Payflows, with a self-serve and tailor-made setup, is up in 1-2 months with no extra work needed.
-p-1080.png)
2
Real time global connectivity
Real time global connectivity
Diapason uses traditional bank channels and lacks modern API integration. Payflows supports both, with real-time payments and continuous data flow for a complete financial overview.
-p-1080.png)
3
Modern user-friendly platform
Modern user-friendly platform
Diapason's complex design slows adoption and requires extensive user training. Payflows’ user-friendly designed platform ensures immediate value, even for advanced features.
-p-1080.png)
Comparison table of Payflows vs Diapason
Payflows provides finance teams with the core functionalities of traditional treasury software, enhanced by modern API connectivity, real-time reporting, and user-friendly tools.
Implementation time
1-2 months
4-5 months
Bank and ERP integrations
Cash visibility and payment capabilities
User-friendly interface
Built-in API banking connectivity
Real-time finance reporting
Self-serve implementation (no integrator needed)
Virtual Cards Add-On
Procurement Module
AI-powered assistant
Our clients trust us
.png)
We use Payflows to sync data from our banks, contract lifecycle management, ticketing systems, and ERP in a single place, giving our teams access to the information they need, in context. Payflows allowed us to break silos while saving a lot of money and reducing the number of licenses we have for each tool.
François-Guillaume Lutton
Chief Financial Officer at Reezocar (Group Société Générale)
Ready to boost your financial productivity?
Get started today, set-up in minutes